Israel’s IDF Chief’s Suspension of External Probe Sparks Political Fallout
Frosty Reception for Proposed Investigative Team
Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi’s decision to form an external investigative team to scrutinize the army’s operational missteps leading up to Hamas’s October 7 onslaught has encountered a barrage of political criticism. Halevi’s reported suspension of the panel’s work until the IDF concludes its internal probes has further inflamed tensions.
The Proposed Investigative Team: Scrutinizing Operational Failures
The proposed team comprised esteemed military veterans: former IDF chief and defense minister Shaul Mofaz, ex-Military Intelligence Directorate head Aharon Ze’evi-Farkash, former Southern Command leader Sami Turgeman, and ex-Operations Directorate chief Yoav Har-Even. Their mission was to draw operational conclusions for the military, not to delve into the political leadership’s policies.
Political Backlash and Concerns: A Maelstrom of Discontent
The appointments ignited a political firestorm, particularly over the inclusion of Mofaz, a vocal critic of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government. Right-wing ministers and lawmakers expressed apprehension that the team might apportion blame to politicians. Mofaz’s role in the 2005 Gaza withdrawal further exacerbated tensions within the far-right coalition members.
Security cabinet meetings intended to discuss strategic planning for postwar Gaza devolved into heated confrontations between ministers and military brass. Right-wing politicians, including some from Netanyahu’s Likud party, vehemently opposed both the timing of the inquest and the inclusion of individuals they deemed unacceptable. These feuds exposed long-simmering tensions between the military and the hard-right coalition over Israeli policies towards the Palestinians.
Far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir welcomed the reported suspension, asserting that entrusting Mofaz and Farkash with the investigation was akin to “letting the cat guard the cream.” He believes that their own actions warrant scrutiny, not the other way around.
Halevi’s Request to Delay State Comptroller’s Investigation: A Clash of Priorities
In a letter to State Comptroller Matanyahu Englman, Halevi sought a delay in the comptroller’s planned investigation into the operational failures. Citing the ongoing war and the need for the IDF’s undivided attention on combat operations, Halevi emphasized the potential disruption to commanders’ focus and operational investigations. Englman, however, maintained the necessity of a thorough investigation, leaving no stone unturned. He affirmed the probe’s priority over other aspects of the state’s functioning.
Scope of the Comptroller’s Investigation: A Comprehensive Examination
Englman’s investigation will delve into a wide spectrum of issues, including the conduct of the security cabinet, policymakers, and the military; intelligence preparedness; defense posture on the Gaza border; civilian security preparedness; funding of Hamas; IDF equipment deficiencies; government actions during and after the outbreak of war; relocation of civilians, evacuation of casualties, and identification of victims; rights of those affected by the attack; and government public diplomacy activities.
Background: Hamas Onslaught and Israel’s Response: A Devastating Conflict
On October 7, Hamas-led terrorists launched a massive incursion into southern Israel, resulting in widespread violence and substantial casualties. Israel responded with a military campaign aimed at neutralizing Hamas and securing the release of hostages. Despite ongoing rocket attacks from Hamas and other terror groups, Israel’s military operation continues.
Conclusion: Navigating the Complexities of Military-Political Dynamics
Halevi’s suspension of the external investigative team and the ensuing political fallout underscore the intricate relationship between the military and the political establishment in Israel. The upcoming investigations aim to extract lessons from the operational failures and bolster the IDF’s preparedness for future conflicts. Balancing operational necessities with political considerations remains a delicate task in Israel’s complex security landscape.