Texas Rancher Praises Gov. Abbott for Defending State Border

Rancher Brent Smith Commends Abbott’s Actions

In a recent interview on “Fox & Friends,” Texas rancher and Kinney County attorney Brent Smith expressed his unwavering support for Governor Greg Abbott’s unwavering efforts to protect the state’s border against the federal government’s neglect and inaction. With unwavering conviction, Smith emphasized that every state possesses the inherent right to self-defense, especially in the face of an invasion or imminent danger to its citizens. He declared that Texas is compelled to take decisive action to ensure the safety and security of its residents and the United States as a whole.

Supreme Court Ruling Sparks Showdown

The recent Supreme Court decision in Texas’ battle with the Biden administration has ignited a showdown of epic proportions over the state’s constitutional authority to defend itself. In a contentious 5-4 decision, the Court temporarily overturned a lower court injunction that prohibited the federal government from cutting razor fencing installed by Texas along the border near Eagle Pass. This pivotal ruling has set the stage for a legal confrontation between Texas and the federal government that promises to be nothing short of explosive.

Abbott Declares Constitutional Authority

In response to the Supreme Court’s decision, Governor Abbott asserted his constitutional authority to protect the state against an invasion with unwavering resolve. He declared that the executive branch had breached its constitutional pact with the states by failing to enforce federal immigration laws, leaving Texas vulnerable and exposed. Abbott emphasized Texas’ inherent right to prevent criminals from entering the state and criticized President Biden for neglecting his duty to secure the border, leaving Texans and Americans alike at the mercy of chaos and lawlessness.

Rancher Supports Abbott’s Actions

With unwavering conviction, Smith maintained that Governor Abbott is acting in accordance with his oath of office and is not defying the federal government. He expressed unwavering confidence in Abbott’s authority to secure the state and safeguard the safety and security of its citizens. Smith highlighted the ongoing fentanyl crisis and the alarming number of deaths associated with it, drawing parallels to a daily 747 airplane crash. He questioned the lack of attention and action from the federal government in addressing this critical issue, emphasizing the devastating impact it is having on communities across the state.

Growing Support from Republican Governors

In a show of solidarity, a growing number of Republican governors have voiced their unwavering support for Texas in the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling. This surge of support signals a broader alignment among Republican leaders in backing Texas’ efforts to defend its border and protect its citizens. Governors from states such as Florida, Arizona, and South Dakota have expressed their willingness to provide assistance to Texas in any way necessary, demonstrating a united front against the federal government’s failure to secure the border.

Legal Experts Validate Texas’ Actions

Renowned legal experts have affirmed that Texas is acting within its constitutional rights and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s order. They emphasized that Texas can continue to build the razor-wire fence even if the federal government persists in cutting it, pending the outcome of the case in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. This legal consensus further solidifies Texas’ position and bolsters its efforts to protect its border and secure its citizens.

Rancher Questions the Death Pact

With a thought-provoking question, Smith challenged the notion that states should passively accept invasion and loss of their sovereignty. He asserted that the founders of the United States would never have envisioned such a scenario and would have rejected any agreement that compromised state autonomy and security. Smith questioned the validity of a “death pact” that would require states to surrender their right to self-defense and allow their citizens to be put at risk.

Conclusion

The ongoing battle between Texas and the federal government over border protection reflects the heightened tensions and conflicting interpretations of constitutional authority. Governor Abbott’s actions have garnered support from fellow Republican governors and legal experts, setting the stage for a potentially protracted legal battle. The outcome of this confrontation will have significant implications for the balance of power between states and the federal government in matters of border security and state sovereignty. As the legal battle unfolds, the eyes of the nation will be fixed on Texas and its unwavering stand against the federal government’s neglect and inaction.