U.S. AIMS TO DETER IRAN-BACKED HOUTHIS IN RED SEA, AVOID ESCALATION, JOINT CHIEFS CHAIRMAN DECLARES

Gen. CQ Brown’s Exclusive Interview with ABC News

In a candid interview with ABC News Chief Global Affairs Correspondent Martha Raddatz, General CQ Brown, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, unveils the U.S.’s objectives in the volatile Red Sea region. General Brown underscores that the recent retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed Houthi militants are primarily intended to deter future conflicts, with the U.S. firmly committed to preventing further escalation.

Deterrence, Not Escalation

Against the backdrop of heightened tensions in the Red Sea, where Houthi rebels have intensified attacks, including launching anti-ship ballistic missiles targeting vessels off Yemen’s coast, General Brown emphasizes the U.S.’s unwavering commitment to deterrence rather than escalation.

“In these areas, we must exercise caution and thoughtfulness in our approach,” stresses Brown. “Predicting the response of these groups is impossible. Prioritizing the protection of our forces while neutralizing their capabilities is paramount.”

Preventing Wider Conflict

General Brown expresses deep concern that an escalation of hostilities in the region could spiral into a wider conflict, potentially involving multiple parties. He underscores the critical importance of measured and strategic actions to avert such a scenario.

“We must avoid a path that leads to greater escalation, ultimately resulting in a much broader conflict within the region,” Brown states resolutely.

Balancing Interests and Risks

Amidst criticism that the Biden administration’s approach to Iran and its proxies has lacked assertiveness, General Brown highlights the necessity of striking a delicate balance between addressing threats and managing risks.

“Consider this,” Brown asks rhetorically. “Do we desire a broader conflict? Do we seek to engage in a full-scale war? Our primary goals are deterrence and protecting our forces.”

Houthi Retaliation and Escalation Concerns

Since last fall, the Houthis have claimed responsibility for over 30 attacks in the Red Sea, asserting that these actions are a direct response to U.S. and British support for Israel’s operations against Hamas. These recent attacks have resulted in vessel damage and forced crew evacuations, raising serious concerns about the safety of maritime traffic in the region.

Congressional Scrutiny and Calls for Authorization

The U.S.-led strikes have elicited mixed reactions from lawmakers. Some, including Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Mike Johnson, have expressed strong support, viewing the military action as a necessary response to Houthi aggression. However, others have argued that Congress should have been consulted before authorizing the strikes.

A bipartisan group of 22 House lawmakers sent a letter to President Biden, expressing concern that the strikes were “unauthorized” and could potentially provoke Iran-backed militias, endangering U.S. military personnel in the region and further escalating tensions. A similar letter was sent earlier this week by a bipartisan group of senators, including Tim Kaine (D-Va.) and Todd Young (R-Ind.).

The Pentagon maintains that the strikes were justified as self-defense, which does not require prior authorization from Congress. However, the lawmakers argue that seeking congressional approval would be a prudent step, particularly given the potential for wider regional conflict.

Conclusion

General Brown’s interview with ABC News offers valuable insights into the U.S.’s strategy in the Red Sea region. His emphasis on deterrence, risk management, and the avoidance of escalation reflects a cautious and measured approach aimed at preventing broader conflict. The ongoing debate among lawmakers over the need for congressional authorization highlights the delicate balance between addressing threats and ensuring accountability in military actions.